Sunday, October 6, 2013

What's the big difference?

I get asked this all the time... What is the deal with natural trimming? How is it different than regular trimming?

First: there isn't one big difference. There's about 6 small differences that add up to be a big difference. 

1. The mustang roll. Quite possibly the most noticeable and/or well known part of the natural trim is the mustang roll. Essentially, a mustang roll involves rounding the entire perimeter of the hoof.


2. Lower (shorter) heels. In order to promote healthy frog health and development, it must have some ground contact. Thus, the heels are trimmed lower so that the frog comes as close to touching the ground surface as possible.


3. The natural arches of the horses foot are allowed to remain (the area called the "quarters" is shorter). The hoof is not designed to be flat, and it shouldn't be forced to be.

4. The frog and sole are NOT trimmed unless absolutely necessary. This is something that traditional farrier schools usually do teach, but does not work well for barefoot horses. Horses need to be allowed to build up a strong thick healthy sole and frog if they are going to be comfortable barefoot.

5. Removal of flares. Even if there aren't huge obvious flares with splits and chips, many horses have some degree of flaring that needs to be addressed.


6. A backed-up (not "shorter"!) toe. Trimming the toe too short from the bottom up is often what causes post-trim soreness. It's important to keep the toe backed up from the front to keep the lamina strong, but not to trim the toe too short from the bottom of the hoof.

Now, as a final caveat:
It's possible that you may be thinking: Well my farrier does all of that, but he doesn't call himself a natural trimmer. To that I will repeat a quote that a wise farrier once told me a long time ago...

"A good farrier is a good farrier is a good farrier. I don't care what you call yourself; I've seen bad farriers and bad natural trimmers... And I've seen old farmers that could trim the lamest horse around and make it sound."

You decide where to take it from there.

Saturday, August 31, 2013

What is founder?

Founder is one of the most painful conditions a horse can encounter; and unfortunately it's all too common. If you've never heard of it before, in a nutshell, "founder" is inflammation inside of the hoof--it specifically affects the part of the hoof that attaches the wall (outside) to the bone inside.

Laminitis vs founder:
Sometimes used interchangeably, there is technically a difference between these two terms. Laminitis refers to the initial acute stages of the disease, where there is significant inflammation inside of the hoof. This can vary in severity, but generally requires veterinary attention (for pain relief and control of inflammation). The acute stages of laminitis can last from a few days to a few weeks, depending on the cause and severity. During this time most horses will have a very hard time walking, walk as if they are "walking on eggshells", and avoid putting weight on the affected hooves (usually both front).

The most challenging part of this disease is often the aftermath, referred to as founder. Founder actually comes from a Latin word that refers to the sinking of a ship. The reason we call it founder today is that it is commonly believed that the coffin bone actually "sinks" and/or rotates inside the hoof capsule. In fact it is a common practice to rate the severity of the founder by measuring the angle of rotation of the coffin bone. 

I'd like to propose a slightly different explanation, however. I believe it would be more accurate if we referred to the angle of rotation of the hoof wall itself, not the coffin bone. You see, the coffin bone cannot and does not actually go anywhere. Logically, as the base of the horses skeletal system, it cannot go anywhere. Let me just show you what I mean. 
If red is the hoof wall and blue is the coffin bone, here is a normal hoof. Note the front lines (a and b) are parallel. The bottom lines (1 and 2) are also parallel. The angle between line a and 1 (or the angle of the hoof wall compared to the ground) is about 55 degrees. The yellow shaded area represents a normal health lamina that is well attached to the hoof wall.

Now lets look at a foundered hoof.

The yellow area has been permanently damaged by inflammation, and the lamina has died, lost its firm attachment, and stretched out. The heels have also gotten longer as the whole foot speeds up its growth in attempts to heal itself. To help understand this concept, I left the coffin bone parallel with the ground in the first picture. But, realistically, our horse is no longer standing on the ground. If he were, he would look like this:
And we begin to see why the coffin bone is considered "rotated"... it appears to have taken a literal nosedive.
But realistically, if the heels hadn't grown out, and the toe hadn't stretched out, the coffin bone wouldn't have "gone" anywhere. Drawing in the original hoof wall, here's where we were at before:
Okay... but then what? Is it permanent?

Can it be fixed?

In a word: YES.

In more than one word: it takes a long time, and a lot of corrective trimming.  Once the lamina has been stretched out and essentially killed, it has to regrow entirely, starting at the coronary band (very top of the hoof) and growing all the way to the ground. During this time, which takes approximately one year, the toe must NEVER be allowed to act as a fulcrum on the fragile, newly grown lamina. What does that mean?
The hoof must be trimmed as follows:
The entire toe area in orange must be removed (remember, it is dead now, hence unneeded). This allows the growing lamina the remain firmly attached to the hoof wall. If the toe is left long, every step the horse takes will stretch the hoof wall away from the coffin bone, damaging the fragile new lamina (shaded pink). See how it would act as a fulcrum if left attached?

"BUT WAIT!!!!" You say now.  "If you trim the heels off, and trim the toe back, then the coffin bone goes right back to where it was! It hasn't really rotated at all!"

Precisely, my friend. Precisely.



PS. What causes founder in the first place?!?
By and large, the most common cause is food related. In a world of processed foods, refined sugars, soda, donuts, and diabetes, it seems that not even our four legged friends are immune to the repercussions of our lifestyle. Their bodies are more sensitive to sugars than humans are, and they are easily exposed to this because of the lifestyle we have provided them. (ie. small pastures with grass and alfalfa planted in them, sweetened and processed feeds, etc).
In a nutshell, any onslaught of sugar can send the horse into a sort of toxic level of high blood sugar (sneaking into the feed bin, an entire bucket of sweet feed from uncle Jimmy, too much rich grass all at once in the spring, etc). Horses metabolisms are not designed to cope with this, and it leads to severe inflammation.

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Welcome!!

 Okay, I cave.

I'm gonna do it!

I LOVE talking about horses feet. Seriously, I think they should make a diagnosable illness for this. It's an obsession. (ICD 9 code anyone? How about 949.403--Equine podiatry related insanity?)

So, of course, the only logical thing to do in this situation is to start a blog all about horse feet.



Wait... what do high heeled shoes and cute little green frogs have to do with it??

EVERYTHING.

Why?

Show me the bottom of your horses foot (specifically, the heels and frog) and I will tell you all about their long and short term soundness and relative health.

Have I captured your attention yet?

Good.


Stay tuned for more on heels, frogs, and what in the sand-blasted-jello they have to do with horses health.

Do draft horses have bad feet?

I get this question a lot. 

A LOT.

Why?

Well, because they usually appear to have bad feet. For example, I googled just "draft horse feet" (not "bad draft horse feet") and here were a few of the first images to appear:


Hmm. Well, I suppose if that's what "draft horse feet" look like one could assume that drafts have poor feet. 

But, lets have a look see at a draft horse that I trim every 6 weeks with a natural trim.


Love this horse. And her owner. :)

So why is there such a big difference? And what makes them look so awful sometimes?

Two things:
1. Many people do not have their draft horses trimmed often enough. I've had clients with drafts that want me to come trim them up once or twice a year. Literally. Also, in defense of the multitude of good horse owners, farriers that will trim drafts can be hard to find, and are usually very expensive. Drafts are big. (Read: physically hard to trim--even if they stand perfectly still.)

2. I hate to say this, because I absolutely HATE the idea of bad mouthing anyone, especially other farriers... But, sometimes farriers are not aware or haven't been taught how to properly trim a draft. The way I was taught to trim in school does NOT work for these guys. Long heels and trying to level off the foot (leaving the quarters the same length as the rest of the foot) asks for trouble, in the form of flares, splits, and cracks.

Why are they so different?

Not just because they are big. They have much much wider, flatter feet. If you look at the length to width ratio on a draft vs another horse there is a huge difference. This predisposes to flares. Flares predispose to cracking, chipping, and losing chunks of hoof wall. This, combined with reason #1, is why we see pictures like this: 
 

Ouch. 

I personally think that drafty horses have practically perfect hoof conformation (genetically). As long they are trimmed properly and consistently they will develop solid frogs, strong heels, and gloriously thick hoof walls. 

So what does a "proper" trim look like for these big guys? The answer to that question is a whole 'nother blog post entirely. ;)